It seems that according to one of the most interesting studies lately, the age that one becomes a father directly influences how big their child’s IQ become. Most people think that the younger you are when you decide to pass your genes onto a son or daughter, the more pronounced those genes will be.
Therefore, if you’re a smart person, the chances of your child inheriting your smart gene is higher when you give birth earlier. As opposed to what most people think, apparently, according to the chart, the older you become before creating offspring, the smarter your children will be.
In the chart provided below, it clearly shows that the gene for IQ is more pronounced in the offspring of those who reproduce later in life. This might mean that if you’re the Albert Einstein of our time, you might want to wait a decade more or two before you should decide to have kids.
This suggests that for years, people have been reproducing wrongly, and that the opportunities for creating the smartest minds in our world today might have potentially been lost – not saying that we don’t have any smart people. However, would they have been even more so if more people tended to reproduce later in life? Additionally, does this mean that the smart people today could have potentially been smarter?
This brings up a completely new debate, though, on the topic of nature vs. nurture, and whether one has a higher effect on the development of the mind than the other. However, it can be said that both are significantly important.
Another thing that also weirdly goes hand-in-hand with the report that this chart came in with, is the fact that in a nationwide survey, it was shown that the more intelligent men in our society tend to reproduce much later in life. Most intelligent people don’t seem to like distributing their seeds too early in life.
On the flipside, however, it seems that when IQ and educational level were controlled, this peculiar effect disappears. Strange how science really works.
Obviously, much more research needs to go into supporting the raw data that has been recently presented, but those in support of this new research seem to be really excited on the possible applications in the future, and how the whole economy would make a complete turnaround if delayed reproduction was adopted.